Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fence magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep And Close. WP:POINTed nomination. Non-admin closure. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fence magazine

Fence magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I created this article, but I now think it is non-notable. Insufficient media coverage, little independent material Formulafiftypoet 17:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep- Contains numerous sources, Formulafiftypoet is just trying to prove a point (see the users talk page) ChrisLamb 18:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and close. Never mind that the nominator is also the article's author, I think that this article passes WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 18:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. I won't comment on the intentions of the nominator, but the subject does indeed pass notability requirements. Trusilver 18:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.