Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fecal Jesus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 23:56 (UTC)
[edit] Fecal Jesus
Non notable. Too few relevant Google hits. Seems to be a one-time joke on a television show. Borders on vandalism because it's twice been nominated for speedy deletion, and the person who started the article has twice removed it.CanadianCaesar 03:11, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- can you say "work in progress"? the deletion nomination occured while i was still adding content, and since the speedy deletion was due to "too short" and i was adding the initial content, I felt the tag was unwarrented. IreverentReverend 03:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Increased use of the "show preview" button usually staves off such problems. Uncle G 03:47, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable. Fuzheado | Talk 03:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete --Tabor 03:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There is scope for a short article about "the slice of bread with x's face in it" phenomenon - recommend the author resubmit with an erudite sounding but less scatalogical title. -- RHaworth 05:09, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- Delete non notable. JamesBurns 10:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I remember that, and it was really just one joke in a sketch. Google results of 29 hits show that it hasn't become a popular term since then, either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:57, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. One shot gag. -- BD2412 talk 13:50, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. --Lee Hunter 17:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non notable. --Flex 18:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete disgusting blasphemous title Anthony Appleyard 21:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: There's lots of material that's blasphemous on wikipedia, no doubt. How is that relevent to it's deleteworthyness? - rernst 13:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- If there's enough similar material to produce a page on random religious icons, then merge with that, otherwise Delete as nonnotable - rernst 13:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable.--Melissadolbeer 04:50, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)Melissadolbeer
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.

