Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farther Common

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:24, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Farther Common

Individual fields and forests are not notable. humblefool®^{Deletion Reform} 02:26, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep But it is the people that lived in this region of East Hampshire that were notable. It is also a proper noun, listed as a location in the Times Atlas of the UK. (Unsigned comment by 80.229.218.245 (talk · contribs))
• Keep, notable. Kappa 07:02, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable place in history and people associated with location.Alf 13:43, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Week keep, though the article may be a copyvio[1]. Besides, all Google hits refer only to that site (which can be found via [2]). --Jūzeris | Talk 17:27, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

• Not CR Violation. Used with permission, Google hits more extensive than indicated. Local authority, and gov sites
• Keep Secretlondon 04:05, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.