Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FX3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. -Mysekurity 21:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FX3

FX3 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log): Delete article about non-notable software being spammed by a single contributor. The company may meet notability requirement, but not all the software that is being advertised via the contributor's Wikipedia articles: User:AndrewGrey edits (talk). Hu 09:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are non-notable software being advertised by User:AndrewGrey edits (talk):

SMAC FX (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
ReportBeam (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (also VS Visual Statement software)
Electronic reporting (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (spam about ReportBeam)
TDS Nomad (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (yet another VS company and more spam)

Merge and Redirect to VS Visual Statement, Inc.. I agree that there appears to be nothing significant with FX3, but it should be mentioned as a product of the comapny which makes it, as long as it is treated in a non-advert manner. Turlo Lomon 09:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Add-On My response is the same for the other product. Merge and Redirect. Turlo Lomon 09:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Andrew Grey's Response I am not deliberately trying to advertise Visual Statement on Wikipedia. I am simply trying to inform the public about who we are and what we do. If you could tell me or help me change the wording of my articles so they meet Wikipedia standards it would be greatly appreciated.
It is not a matter of "changing wording". It is a matter of overall intent and approach. As you were informed on your talk page before your response here, do not use Wikipedia for advertising, spam, promotion, PR, commercials, or publicity. Also, you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Hu 21:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Response

My intent is to inform the public. This is the first time I have written Wikipedia articles, I would greatly appreciate it if you told me the correct way to write one of these articles so it is not an advertisement as that was not my intention! Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewGrey (talk • contribs) 15:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

  • You might try reading WP:YFA. shoy 15:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete All as articles serve only as spam link to each company's website.--Gavin Collins 09:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all agreed, that is WP:SPAM without independent sources to establish notability. Carlosguitar 20:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.