Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUROBIKE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FUROBIKE

Clearly original research (see WP:NOR)... This paper is based on an actual human powered vehicle built in ITBHU by the authors. etc. Doesn't cite anything, as far as I can tell, since this would be the citation. W.marsh 20:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• How shall I delete thee; let me count the ways: original research, advertising, vanity, possible copyright infringement; choose your poison. You're supposed to hand in your assignment to your teacher, not to Wikipedia. --IByte 20:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Google search for "FUROBIKE" reveals a whopping total of two hits - one a blog, and one an advert for the blog. Dogpile search reveals 5 hits, again of no quality. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 20:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. —Quarl ^(talk) 2005-12-31 02:04Z
• Delete. NeoJustin 18:03, December 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:VSCA, and WP:BALLS. Stifle 13:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.