Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Woot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FC Woot

FC Woot (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable local six-a-side football team. WP:Vanity also a concern, as only someone within/linked to the club could have such detailed knowledge. Number 57 22:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. It doesn't seem to be part of a notable league. YechielMan 04:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete - The absence of sources and quantity of red links may indicate insufficient notability. Possible fancruft (more likely than vanity). Adrian M. H. 16:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
    • I beg to differ and think vanity is definitely more likely, as six-a-side teams comprising a bunch of friends who play at their local indoor sports centre on weekday nights don't generally have a fanbase. Anyway, totally non-notable team, so delete ChrisTheDude 08:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. As far as I can tell, no 6-a-side (or 5-a-side or any other variant) teams have reached the level of notability suitable for such an article. - fchd 21:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 08:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete - totally non-notable. Note to nominator: This could have quite easily been speedied or prodded, please bear that in mind next time you nominate such an article. Qwghlm 08:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Qwghlm... The Rambling Man 09:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete utterly not notable --Dweller 15:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete as above, non-notable.♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 21:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.