Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eye candy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, with the fate of the content (merge, transwiki, cleanup, etc.) decided later. `'Míkka>t 14:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Eye candy

Eye candy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unreferenced original research. Dictdef. Mikeblas (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep. I've added some references, although the article still needs work. The article is also more than just a definition entry, citing both PhotoShop and PowerPoint. Andareed (talk) 21:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. This looks more like a dictionary entry than an article, Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary. BananaFiend (talk) 12:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Not a dicdef. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Not a dictionary definition, and capable of expansion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Not so sure about that... Every paragraph is dedicated to the definition of the term - one of the only two links is a dictionary link. 194.149.77.201 (talk) 14:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as BananaFiend stated. Also, I feel there is no encyclopedic value to this article. ArcAngel (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep --Reinoutr (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Decoration or Ornament. Deletion is no good as a computer gamer will soon recreate it and it is a valid search term. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. More than a dicdef. A cultural saying with cultural meaning. Operating (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary, just because a dictionary definition lists several meanings of a term, doesn't mean it isn't still a list of definitions. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, or transwiki to wiktionary. All examples that are listed are... examples. JFW | T@lk 03:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is more than a mere dictionary definition. I'm also surprised we don't have more coverage on the Adobe Photoshop plugins by the same name. (jarbarf) (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.