Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exopolitics (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Exopolitics

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Exopolitics Articles for deletion/Exopolitics (2nd nomination)
Exopolitics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is based on a self-published book. Much of it is WP:OR, anything that isn't should be at Alfred Webre Doug Weller (talk) 07:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. The subject may be unscientific but it clearly has its proponents and whilst the article needs some clean-up it looks passable to me. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 08:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, I think study of hypothetical political relations says it all. Unless we can add sufficient refs to no longer violate WP:V, WP:SOAP, WP:N, I see no way we can prevent deletion. Will change if article suddenly improcves. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 11:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep There are lots of hypothetical articles on Wikipedia. 80.65.250.247 (talk) 21:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)— 80.65.250.247 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Comment Did you forget to login (this surely isn't really your first edit)? I'm sure you know other stuff exists is not a convincing reason. Doug Weller (talk) 21:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • NOTE attempt to speedy delete this page USER:Phalanxpursos besides adding the tag above, has removed the AfD tag on the article with the comment 'removed vanalism' see [1] -- can an Admin please deal with this? Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 08:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment Just in case anyone wonders, the tag added was a speedy delete tag for this article. Now removed by a helpful admin. Doug Weller (talk) 09:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Nomen. --Ave Caesar (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • I wish there was some way to keep this lovely farrago of nonsense, but sadly I can't think of any. Delete. --Relata refero (disp.) 13:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete I see a lot of ghits, but since the term is based largely off the work of a single author (who's also made a lot of contribs to that page), I'll go with delete. // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 14:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Nomen. --Folantin (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)