Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelion shot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing to merge as the entire article is unsourced. --Coredesat 05:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Evangelion shot

Evangelion shot (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This term does not seem to be in actual use anywhere outside of Wikipedia — not even on anime fansites. A Google search that weeds out mirrors of this article and phrases like "Evangelion shot glass" turns up nothing but irrelevancies ("The Evangelion shot up the tube to the surface") and lists of content that seems to be taken from Wikipedia (for example, an Answers.com content listing that links to their article that is taken from this one). There aren't even anime fansites that make any reference to this supposed type of shot. The term does not appear to exist outside of Wikipedia. -Branddobbe 02:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete neolegism with no shown notibility/popularity of term. Poorly scribes what exactally the shot is meant to be making it unverifable also.--Dacium 03:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Neon Genesis Evangelion, leaving out the unsourced statement that it pioneered the technique. IIRC the technique is distinctive and prominent in the series. Pomte 03:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No evidence that this is not WP:OR. ShadowHalo 04:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Unless Sourced per Shadow Halo. Ganfon 13:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:V and is probably original research. Recury 15:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.