Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estate and house agents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Boldly redirected to thieving bastards Guy (Help!) 15:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Estate and house agents

Estate and house agents (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Reason Vivaverdi 00:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Simply copied from a totally out of date 1911 reference.

• Comment This AfD was malformed. I'm correcting it now. --ais523 13:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like a misquote from the 1911 EB; there are sentences cut off and much of it is hard to understand ('to take out yearly a licence upon which 2 is charged as a duty of excise,', anyone?) It's hard to tell from the article what it's about. --ais523 13:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Why bother? Redirect to Estate agent. Content is both poo and much less likely a search term than its simpler cousin. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.