Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erickson, Peters & Thoms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Erickson, Peters & Thoms

Erickson, Peters & Thoms (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unrefernced, uncategorized, spamish... It's a contensted prod. Evilclown93_(talk) 00:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. This firm has no Google hits (though successor firm does have a few), no verification, and it is a bit spammy. Realkyhick 02:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:CORP Bucketsofg 13:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I don't see any claim to awards, honors, or anything beyond a regional interest. Rklawton 14:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.