Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envy (pornstar)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus --JForget 00:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Envy (pornstar)

Envy (pornstar) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not established. Unreferenced. Vinh1313 (talk) 09:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per CSD A7. Just another porn actor that fails WP:BIO —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBilly (talk • contribs) 10:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No awards and no evidence of substantial non-trivial third-party coverage.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 12:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom and HisSpaceResearch. Redfarmer (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, lack of notibility not established in nomination for deletion. Also, I revised the article, added sources, and added discussion on the talk page. Please re-vote based on changed article. Fredsmith2 (talk) 07:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment: Just a reminder that according to WP:BIO, notability is presumed for a pornographic actress when one of the following is met:
  • Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards or from a major pornographic magazine, such as Penthouse, Playboy, or Playgirl, as well as their counterparts in other pornography genres.
  • Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography, or starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature.
  • Has been featured multiple times in mainstream media.Vinh1313 (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment: And as another reminder, here's the header to that policy: "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." Fredsmith2 (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Unfortunately, her stage name is such a common word, that searching for sources about her is extremely difficult. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per award nom. Epbr123 (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - these "awards" seem to be easier to come by than graduation certificates. Deb (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Starred in 214 films? That is notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.