Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envox Worldwide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, while the article was improved, Smerdis of Tlön is right, and those changes weren't formed, I'll be happy to undelete and place it on a user subpage for the editor to improve on the article. Secret ^account 23:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Envox Worldwide

Envox Worldwide (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not a notable corporation. Cites seem to not really meet WP:RS. Avruch^Talk 00:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Per the nom. The intro reads a bit advertisment-y and the most of the sources are not reliable. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The less notable a business is, the likelier it becomes that they will use the words "global", "worldwide", or "international" in their business name. We have a global provider of IP-based voice solutions here. If someone wants to dissolve my voice, again, please use ethanol. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comments and for the opportunity to fine tune the listing. I’ve reviewed the post and have made significant changes to the language in keeping with the style of other “company” posts that I found on Wikipedia. Additionally, I’ve added third party references that substantiate the statements made within the text. I am hopeful that the post now gains your acceptance.Turkucken^Talk

• The newer version is somewhat improved. I still believe you need to go through and render every mention of "solutions" in the article into more concrete terms. This doesn't appear to be a chemical firm. I do ride a high horse on this use of the word "solution," which strikes me as an atrociously ugly neologism; more importantly, labelling the business's products and services as "solutions" inherently violates our WP:NPOV policy. I did rewrite the opening paragraph to get rid of one of them; I don't know enough about the business to rewrite labels like converged communication solutions into concrete, plain English. The paragraph that begins Envox Worldwide is active in the Voice Solutions market probably needs to go in its entirety; it doesn't seem to be about this business specifically in any case. With these changes, I would recommend that the article be kept. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Seems to be adequately referenced now. Needs categories, though. --Eastmain 21:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.