Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entitilitis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Entitilitis

Totally non-notable. Neologism and fancruft too. Reyk 00:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, entirely non-notable and could probably never be expanded. -- Mithent 01:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Mr. Show since its only relevance is there, otherwise Delete as non-notable. Gwernol 01:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even though it seems to be what all the vanity page writers have ("I am entitled to have a page on Wikipedia..."). --Midnighttonight 01:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Gwernol. Feezo (Talk) 02:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to List of characters from Mr. Show. Only you can help find a cure. -- Samir (the scope) 02:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It doesn't even have a consistent spelling throughout M1ss1ontomars2k4 06:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to List of characters from Mr. Show, and delete as fancruft. --Terence Ong 09:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. _→AzaToth 15:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.