Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ---J.S ^(T/C) 01:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Empire Family

Empire Family (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This article is about a single family line at a chapter of Delta Chi. It simply isn't notable enough for inclusion. — BrotherFlounder (aka DiegoTehMexican) 22:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

There are several versions of the empire family lines throughout different chapter's. The Empire Family wikipedia page was created to allow all families to link to this page. I can create a list so that differenc schools can be added if they are part of it. Monteque 00:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

It is not a single family line - Monteque 00:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment - Even if there are more Empire Family lines in different chapters, Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and a page for all of them to simply congregate is not appropriate. — BrotherFlounder (aka DiegoTehMexican) 01:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment -- I'm not sure about the Empire Family article itself, but their use of the triquetra is definitely non-notable with respect to article Triquetra, so I would appreciate it if Monteque wouldn't add mis-spelled and mistaken material to that article again in future. AnonMoos 03:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable subgroup of a fraternity, founded only a few months ago, likely WP:COI, no significant external sources. We have always consistently deleted individual fraternity chapters for one school. I don't see this as any different. Any worthwhile content (though I can't see any offhand) can be added to the Delta Chi article. Fan-1967 15:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

i understand, go ahead and remove it Monteque 17:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• ... Picking myself up from the floor, where I have been rolling around laughing at the ludicrously unencyclopedic nature of this article ( not to mention what appears to be CoI ), I stagger to my keyboard and press the big red button marked Delete. WMMartin 17:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of external notability. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day also applies. GRBerry 03:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.