The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert 17:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
substub, complete vanity. seems notable, but the current form of the article is in no way encyclopedic. -Greg Asche(talk) 21:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete, per nom. Someone can write a real article later if they want to. -- SCZenz 22:26, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
delete advertisement for on-line bank. Pete.Hurd 16:46, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.