Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elysia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Elysia

Elysia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

a collection of facts with no actual sources to establish a connection. this is basically a trivia page and a violation of WP:OR to try to imply they are connected as a concept. Law/Disorder 03:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

  • I note there is no AfD tag on the article, you may wish to do so, otherwise this will be closed as out of process. As for the article, redirect it to Elysium, and if there's any sources discussing the phenomenon of using Elysia, we can add a line or to on that article. i (talk) 21:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
oh, woops, ok then. Law/Disorder 05:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. This appears to be some borderline OR trying to connect a bunch of non-notable topics which don't belong on Wikipedia in the first place. Doctorfluffy 03:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck 16:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Just a bunch of unrelated fictional references to Elysian Fields. -- Dougie WII 18:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:FICT, WP:NOR, etc. Stifle (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Elysium: Interesting, but the various uses don't seem to connect to each other, so it seems to violate WP:NOR. This could be a worthy paragraph in Elysium since that does seem to be where the name comes from, but it would have to be compressed into a paragraph because it isn't important to that subject. Noroton 03:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC) minor edit Noroton 03:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.