Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellie Idol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ellie Idol
Doesn't pass WP:BIO. Epbr123 08:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: I will post a pornographic image of mine if this will be permitted. Delete per WP:BIO. Delete per WP:BIO. Delete per WP:BIO. --βandβ (talk•contribs) 10:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 14:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Tabercil 14:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, as they all said. Looked for notability, couldn't find any. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete 0 relevant returns on AVN, Xbiz, Porn Valley Dispatch and Gnews. No awards. Not even a particularly high ghit total, and nothing there looked useful. She's cute, but very much lacking in notability. Horrorshowj 19:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. This article doesn't present a good case of why it should be included in Wikipedia. Also, I think the article itself is borderline advertisement due to the links to one of her videos. Icestorm815 19:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability AndrewRT(Talk) 23:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't pass porn-bio requirements. SkierRMH 02:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable enough in the porn world. BTW I deleted the link advertising one of her website shoots as I believe such links violate Wikipedia policy. 23skidoo 13:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Don't Delete I'm a fan. Wanted to know more about her, so I came to Wikipedia. Isn't that how it's supposed to work? The "delete" comments seem to all repeat that she's not notable enough to deserve an entry. I'm the fan - isn't that for me to say? Bootstrap 22:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.183.208 (talk)
- Delete per Tabercil. TGreenburgPR 05:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

