Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Clarke Cunningham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Elizabeth Clarke Cunningham

Elizabeth Clarke Cunningham (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The name of some ashes in a box, not encyclopedic, delete. --Peta 02:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as it stands the article fails WP:N Signed Jeepday 02:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete This seems like a curiosity, not an encyclopedic subject. Notability seems limited to me. Pig^man_dialogue 05:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:N and WP:BIO. Mkdw^talk 08:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete it is a curious news story of only passing interest. -- Whpq 17:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Notability lacks seriously, and the article doesn't seem right either. Retiono Virginian 17:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  10:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep has been the subject of news stories. Wikipedia is not paper. I think this is adequately encyclopedic.--Golden Wattle ^talk 02:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.