Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic art music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as moot. The page at issue is currently a redirect, and redirects for deletion belong somewhere else. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Electronic art music

Electronic art music (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Page moved to History of Electronic Music

The article is a the histroy of electronic music but the user create it with the name art add because there is an electronic music article already exist. Two things same name. Now some adjust to move it in History of Electronic Music. There is no need for this Electronic Art Music, please vote delete. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electronic_music Susume-eat 05:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

What you've done is moved the page by copy-paste. You don't want to do that, for this reason, from WP:MOVE:

Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, because doing so destroys the edit history. (The GFDL requires acknowledgement of all contributors, and editors continue to hold copyright on their contributions unless they specifically give up this right. Hence it is required that edit histories be preserved for all major contributions until the normal copyright expires.)

I'm going to undo it. You may either propose the move by suggesting on the talk page, or being bold and doing it yourself, in which case the original page is converted into a redirect. Antandrus (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. Improperly formatted AfD. This is a major music genre article with extensive content. There are complex merge discussions in progress but the idea of just deleting it is simply absurd.

  Also: this AfD is not formatted correctly. There is no notification on the article page.

  And: the nominator moved the page to a different title without any discussion. I've moved it back over the redirect. --Parsifal _Hello 05:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Major topic, I don't think this needs to be deleted. --Hirohisat ^Talk 06:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep As noted above, there may be some merge issues (along with some need for further attribution). But as the article currently stands, it discusses a genre of music with a great deal of content and sourcing, and clearly meets WP:N. Given the facts (to say nothing of the AfD protocol issues), I think it's worth invoking WP:SNOW and keeping now. bfigura ^(talk) 06:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.