The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Advertising, non-notable campaign. Few lines in parent company's article would do, if anything. Chrisd87 10:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Don't even see a few lines in parent company's article as having any use, since WP is not a newspaper. Tychocat 11:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 18:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom, unencyclopedic. --TeaDrinker 05:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.