Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Lascelles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 02:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edward Lascelles

Speedy Delete (CSD A7) -- I've AFD'd this as while i believe no claim to notability is established, other editors may disagree. This person is 42nd in line for the throne, has done nothing notable. Being in line isnt really notable, when everyboody in the UK is in line. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 18:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Most titled families include articles for the presumptive heir. Delete the rest. Note: nominator should review the criteria for speedy deletion. This doesn't qualify. Fan-1967 00:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • delete or mergeto David, Viscount Lascelles not notable in own right Ohconfucius 03:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as previous little Lascelles as lacks any sign of reporting by WP:RS, do not merge. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as per other articles nominated by same user -- Roleplayer 02:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Please do not "vote"; AFD is not a vote. The relevant standard is set out at WP:BIO, and the subject - in my view - meets none of the criteria for inclusion. The nominator's comment regarding WP:CSD A7 is well made as the subject escapes inclusion iff 43rd in line to the throne is a claim of notability, but the Royal Family's website has a list, and that stops at 39th. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge into some article about his family provided that reliable references are added. Ardric47 20:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.