Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden Mor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proto::► 12:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eden Mor

Eden Mor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No justification of notability, failure of WP:PORNBIO. Beaker342 21:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per the nomination. Not even a gesture was made towards establishing notability. janejellyroll 05:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 08:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. MER-C 09:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Jyothisingh 13:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of women endowed with huge breasts ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 15:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete big tits alone is not enough to be noted Alf photoman 20:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep With the many obscure articles here, I don't see why there'd be desire to delete someone like this out. She's got a commercial website, so people might independantly find her name, then perhaps come here to see if there's more info. What's the harm in it staying? And for that matter, why shouldn't the site contain a directory of "big bust models and performers" (the definition of either of those terms being sketchy of course) when that is, let's face it, likely to be of interest to a fair number of people. It's the Information Age after all... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.145.241.180 (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC).
• Delete per nomination. There is plenty of info on obscure adult models elsewhere. Jlricherson 01:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete She's got big tits and a website. Who cares? Paxsimius 05:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, fails PORNBIO really huge time SkierRMH,00:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and per invalid/nonsense arguments from unsigned participant. Ohconfucius 04:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.