Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ectorallin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ectorallin

Ectorallin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seems to be original research. A google search for the term "Ectorallin" returns no matches [1] A^RendedWinter 09:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

You are right, when you say that Ectorallin brings up no results in Google. However there are no webpages on it, it is graddually being considered a technique used in music or found in music. It is under scientific clarification and study on exactly how it makes our minds react to music.

This page may be a reference point for people learning about Ectorallin and will be a place to shoe future studies.

You are also right - it is almost original research, but it is becoming more popular.

You have every right to delete this page as the whole world has not heard of it. But they may become more interested in what and how it works by having the page on Wiki.

Thanks a lot-

VD VerticalDonkey 10:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I have edited the article and it now fits in more with Wiki's guidlines.

Also, I reccomend as a category, maybe musical techniques? If there is one. Or perhaps Musicn on it's own.

Cheer VerticalDonkey 11:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, without reliable sources this page looks entirely like original research, which is not allowed on wikipedia. Where did you get this information from? Without sources, my view would be delete. bikeable (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, original research. NawlinWiki 18:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR with no reliable sources. SkierRMH 01:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• You are, right, there are no reliable resourses on the net. However you may find that there are some books that contain this information. However, I do not know how to reference book on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VerticalDonkey (talk • contribs) 07:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.