Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic abortionism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Economic abortionism

Orphaned article, no references. All google hits I could find seemed to be derived from Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I'm plugged into what they are saying on Err America and I haven't heard this. Ruby 05:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism rule, recreate it over at Wiktionary if needed. Calwatch 05:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. If there was a verifiable citation that could be added that proved this term had entered debate in a notable way - i.e., in a periodical circulation > 5000, or on a major TV or radio show, or used repeatedly by a notable author, I'd change my vote. But examining the article history makes that seem unlikely. -Ikkyu2 06:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Unless verified, per Ikkyu2. I have heard this point expressed, but not the term. Logophile 09:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Tony. Proto t c 11:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologistic, personal essay. Marskell 13:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. --Terence Ong 14:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.