Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duty-faith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 07:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Duty-faith

dicdef Melaen 19:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - important concept in Christian theology. Endomion 20:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per Endomion DaGizza^{Chat (c)} 21:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The article needs to be completely re-written. It is not accurate at any point. It is not a Reformed doctrine, as distinct from others - on the contrary, it is terminology that is used by certain deviant forms of Calvinism to describe their opponents. It is not hyper-calvinism; on the contrary, it is held by just about anybody who isn't a hyper-calvinist - and denial of it is a mark of a form of hyper-calvinism. Furthermore, this is quirky language that has limited use in reference to a particular controversy. — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 22:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment as you wish, reverting to original form and withdrawing vote to keep. Endomion 22:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - yeh, I'll go with Mark - nothing much lost anyway. --Doc ^ask? 23:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. KHM03 11:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- The concept is adequately addressed in proper context under Hyper-Calvinism. Jim Ellis 12:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Flex 16:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.