Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr David Cooper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr David Cooper

Dr David Cooper (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No proof of notability on page. Page started with user of same or similar user name Snowman 13:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Note to closer: If this AfD results in deletion, Trinity the Hospice in the Fylde should also probably be deleted. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 21:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
    • It is a good sized hospice and probably well known in the locality, and I feel that it should not be deleted with the David Cooper page which is in question. I have tidied the hospice page and added categories, so more people will be aware of it. Snowman 08:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - otherwise we would have to list every doctor in the world.

Camillus (talk) 16:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:BIO & probably could have been speedied since no assertion is made of notability. Eusebeus 18:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and above. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 21:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Hard to search for further evidence due to the common name; however, physicians do not have inherent notability and the directorship of a small local hospice (which should not be deleted as part of the present AfD) appears insufficient. He is already mentioned under the hospice, and this seems adequate coverage. Espresso Addict 14:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, because, while he appears to be an angel of mercy, he is not notable by himself. Bearian 01:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.