Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downtown Kansas City, Kansas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. FayssalF - Wiki me up® 09:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Downtown Kansas City, Kansas

Downtown Kansas City, Kansas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Consists entirely of a directory of places. Since the subject itself is notable, I nominate it for deletion with no prejudice against recreation. Nyttend 17:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete contains no text, Wikipedia is not a phone book. Man It's So Loud In Here 17:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Any relevant information can be added to the Kansas City, Kansas article, or this article can be recreated when a daughter article becomes necessary.--Danaman5 18:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOT#DIR, doesn't seem to have relevant info worth merging. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 18:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. IP198 22:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • CSD & appropriately tagged Corpx 22:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete per nom and other reasons given within above votes. Darkprincealain 22:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY; also note that author has also been adding copyrighted text to the main Kansas City, Kansas article. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 22:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete looks more like a test page unless you delete the content and redirect it to the Kansas City article.--JForget 02:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, maybe speedily, because the article doesn't provide any context. The topic itself is notable, though, and I wouldn't mind seeing a proper article created in its place. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Keep pending review. The deleting administrator's talk page is locked and doesn't allow written entries. This article was deleted too soon. I can't say whether the writing was any good but neighborhood articles are permitted and are sometimes well written. Sorry for modifying this but the administrator has locked his own discussion page. E343ll 16:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)