Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do Me ... London

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do Me ... London

Do Me ... London (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • Delete - This looks like an advertisement. A search on Google for the service brings up few results aside from Wikipedia, although the search results may be sensitive to how the search term is written (which is why I did not go the speedy delete route). Nonetheless, the company and this product appear to be non-notable, which is why I have nominated this for deletion. Dr. Submillimeter 08:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • clear Delete - it's WP:SPAM. Kbthompson 09:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • 100% delete - no question hjuk 10:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom et al. --Evb-wiki 13:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Adam Cuerden talk 15:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom - its an adver-article! Rgds, --Trident13 20:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Whether it be an advertisement or not, it is a brochure, and it is notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LtWinters (talk • contribs) 00:25, 18 June 2007
  • Delete - one question; Would Encarta or Brittannica have an entry on this? non-notable spam. Jhamez84 01:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Please see the related nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Whitehead. Dr. Submillimeter 15:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - WP:SPAM & per nom Rossrs 22:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: nothing more than advertising. --RFBailey 17:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.