Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distorted Penguins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Distorted Penguins

Three reason,

1. Wikipedia is not a site to promote unsigned bands
2. another is not notable enough, not even having such amount on mp3.com is deservable
3. is this page do exist then all these not notable unsigned bands is gonna place their entry there just for their own benefit.

Dr Tobias Funke 16:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep If we accept that the article is factually accurate, then their album production and tour programme qualifies under WP:MUSIC.--Anthony.bradbury 16:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep if sources confirming the notability claims against WP:MUSIC are provided. Otherwise Delete Nuttah68 16:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• I hate to do this, but Delete. If we can get something to prove notability other than the band's own website (i.e., WP:RS is your friend), I'll change my mind right quick. --Dennisthe2 19:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Dennisthe2. Nothing in the article even claims enough to pass WP:MUSIC except the discography, but if that's self-produced, that isn't a claim either. The "19-state tour" sounds fishy to me without a reference, for all we know they just took a road trip and played in a few bars: no big deal. If any references seriously change the situation, I'd change my opinion. Mangojuice^talk 15:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.