Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disenchanted

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disenchanted

Disenchanted (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Procedural nomination, in accordance with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End.. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all 15 songs that were up for deletion on that AFD. I am clearly neutral as this is a Procedural nomination. —— Eagle101 ^{Need help?} 04:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Consists almost entirely of original research, no apparent third-party coverage. ShadowHalo 10:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no assertion of notability. Mallanox 14:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. Edeans 20:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep This song may be released as a single soon, and it's too much of an important song to fans to delete. It was a huge deal in the feud with The Used. I'll work on references tonight.--Jude 06:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It can always come back if it's released as a single. Being part of a non-notable "feud" isn't really an assertion of notability. GassyGuy 13:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NN. -DMurphy 23:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep May be released as single; easier to just keep the page. Mcr616 18:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete For now. If it is released it'll be easier to re-create the page than re-delete if it's not. Rehevkor 18:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.