Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirka dirka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 19:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dirka dirka

Dirka dirka (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No reliable sources on this, doesn't meet Wikipedia:Verifiability. Xyzzyplugh 14:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. So flaky that you'd be hard put to establish an agreed spelling for this. Fails WP:NEO. BTLizard 14:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete delete as as neologism neologism. YechielMan 14:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC) YechielMan 14:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "A search will yield a result of "no camparible term found", or reference to the term "dirca", a North American shrub, or "dirk", which is a form of dagger or knife". Nuff said — iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable gag from a couple of South-Park related media. --Haemo 22:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable phrase in pop culture, 1,080,000 G-hits [1]. --Candy-Panda 11:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
    • The phrase "blue shirt" has 850,000 google hits, while the phrase "lots of stuff" gets 1,240,000 google hits. We don't keep or delete articles based on number of google hits. Have you found any reliable sources on this? (and "dirka dirka", in fact, gets only 30,000 google hits, not 1 million) --Xyzzyplugh 13:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete it's a neologism. I'd be very surprised if reliable sources could be found. Jay32183 23:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep notable pop culture phrase popularised by South Park and Team America. --NinjaBunny 07:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Xyzzyplugh. Captain Infinity 11:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Great movie, but there are no reliable sources, so I have to say delete for the time being. -- Scorpion 14:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.