Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Exhaust Injection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete, Hoax/Nonsense. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 16:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Direct Exhaust Injection

Direct Exhaust Injection (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability, advertisement like copy, and the only "source" is a forum. Nburden ^(T) 09:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Looking at the forum linked it seems to be a joke. Even if true it was only thought of a week ago, and has gained no notability whatsoever. Alberon 09:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - clearly a joke idea. --Sesameball^Talk 09:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• 'Speedy Keep Should be real. 203.220.107.71 09:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)'

keep it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.44.70 (talk) 11:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• A very good hoax, so a reluctant Delete. Phil Bridger 11:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

besides the fact that there is no mention of when and where the final exhaust exits the vehicle and the fact that eventually even with intercoolers the tempatures would melt the block. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.209.95.66 (talk) 13:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The guy is an idiot, and nobody can figure out if he is stupid, or its a hoax. Either way, delete it to make wiki a better place. - B34M3R —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.1.24.106 (talk) 14:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't delete it yet, wait until its spread a little more. We need more people to see this crazy idea and understand its impossible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.138.43.30 (talk) 15:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete I randomly found this article via a web forum and it's just something some idiot made up. Non-noteable. --rubbrchikin(talk) 15:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.