Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design for All

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Design for All

Design for All (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article has been previously speedied twice before, prod now contested. Very little in the article about the initiative but an awful lot of WP:SOAP about what they are trying to achieve. No independent references/citations/sources at all. Search term is too generic for an accurate ghit assessment WebHamster 13:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete seems to be saying something about handicap accessability (or not, it's hard to tell) but written in a confused semi-nonsense style. If I had to guess, I'd say it's some kid's homework assignment or similar. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment WP:IDONTKNOWIT is not a valid deletion argument. Wl219 16:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as no independent sources provided as evidence of notability per WP:CORP. --Gavin Collins 14:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and then consider a redirect to Universal design. This is an important topic, but this particular page is a one-organization approach. bikeable (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I de-prodded it. Needing cleanup shouldn't be a basis for deletion. The term is in wide usage and the initiative can be sourced. Wl219 16:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete sourced only from it's eponymous website: seems like spam written in bureaucratese and I still can't fathom what it is trying to say. Anyway, not notable from significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:CORP and WP:N. Carlossuarez46 18:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.