Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic communism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Democratic communism

Democratic communism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Apparent neologism. Google turns up a few hits for the term, but (other than a few discussion list postings), they all appear to be talking about the general possibility of communism being democratic, rather than a defined concept. Warofdreams talk 19:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete attempts to reconcile Communism and democracy are better covered in the Eurocommunism page.Nick Connolly 19:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete Seems like some original research coupled with neologism. Decoratrix 19:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Weak keep and source it properly. It's not an incoherent concept, so I'm sure somebody's written about it. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - The entire article has a very strong appearance of being an editor's OR. The concept is certainly coherent and may even be notable (although I haven't seen any evidence for this so far), but this article as it stands is beyond redemption. --Hyperbole 20:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism i.e. protologism. To Mike.lifeguard: it is the responsibility of those seeking material to be included to provide the appropriate references, not the job of those who want it deleted to prove they don't exist. Stifle (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and improve it. --Inbloom2 21:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Though I look forward to the writer of the article doing pieces on 'dry water' and 'flat mountains' as well. Nick mallory 23:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.