Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep K Datta-Ray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deep K Datta-Ray

Deep K Datta-Ray (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is written entirely by the subject of the article, subject is not notable and seems to be adding links to personal blog all over the place. Orpheus 10:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —Espresso Addict 11:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Subject lacks notability, and spams articles that have anything to do with him. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 13:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. This contributor has obviously not understood Wikipedia. / Mats Halldin (talk) 19:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Unfortunately contributor seems to make his own rules, and pays no attention to how Wikipedia works, Modernist 20:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no notability as a writer, whatever he may think of himself, and certainly none as an academic. DGG (talk) 02:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The subject/author seems to be pushing his own agenda instead of trying to contribute constructively. There are 44 hits on Google for "Deep K Datta-Ray" -wiki. I'm more notable than this guy. • Maurog • 09:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Well, if we're going to use the google test, I'm more notable than him too, by a mile -- and I certainly don't merit a wiki article, so neither does he. Spazure 06:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination, total conflict of interest to boot. Burntsauce 22:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment The author (and subject) of the article recently removed this AfD from the log of articles for deletion. Orpheus 09:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment The author (and subject) of the article has also tried removing the AfD tag on the article a couple times. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.