Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death cube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Death cube

Death cube (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete - non-notable fictional technology, the aricle itself describes it as a "throwaway reference" in its main use. Other uses are described as "implied." Otto4711 01:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Bigtop 01:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the article describes this as an insignificant mention, the other references appear to be conjecture, not a clear reference. SkierRMH 02:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Selmo ^(talk) 02:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable fictional Technology. Daniel5127 <Talk> 03:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 06:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MiracleMat 07:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete despite my general fondness of The Cookie Monster. per nom. TonyTheTiger 17:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom  ::mikmt 18:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Death to this cube. ~ Flameviper 21:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Deleteper nom---SUIT⁴² 23:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge then delete — Article describes this as a "throwaway reference" and "from context they appear to be", both of which indicate that this article is original research. Take what can be referenced and merge it in to the article with the book cited. Val42 05:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.