Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hall (athlete)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Hall (athlete)

As far as I can see, fails Notability test Sceptre ^(Talk) 14:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Although it may be notable, the contributor just goes round adding olympic athletes with one line Sceptre ^(Talk) 16:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - doesn't appear to have been a notable athlete. -- (aeropagitica)  15:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep won an olympic medal, thats notable enough for me. --Pboyd04 15:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, winning an olympic medal is a notable achievement which is easily verified, since all of the medalists are listed on olympic.org. - Bobet 16:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, obviously. Olympic medallist. Punkmorten 17:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Our friends in the substub club may be annoying to work with at times, but the correct answer is to expand and cleanup if notable. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, as obviously notable athlete. Carioca 18:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletions.
• Keep all Olympic medalists. --Rob 18:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• The 1900 games weren't the huge thing they are now, but winning an Olympic medal is a decent claim for notability. Average Earthman 00:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.