Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny vendramini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Danny vendramini

Danny vendramini (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Can this be saved? I am not a scientist, so i cannot save it. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 19:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete I added the only 2 references i could find to the article. Mr. Vendramini's paper, which is his original research (if you want to see what his theory is). I'm leaning towards delete due to WP:N and lack of WP:RS, Yet feel best to have this review by someone else with knowledge in the area. I could only find his own site and 1 news site that interviewed him, no 3rd party confirmation to remove blatant WP:OR MatthewYeager 22:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is not original thought as it has been published and his paper is linked to by the article. It is however not notable. I am both an Australian and in the field, and I have never come accross this paper or any of its proponents. This is particularly significant since the idea's creator (like any idea that opposes natural selection as the ONLY method of evolution) fails to fully understand the absolute scope of modern selection theory. That is, that any change is only successful if it is favorable. In any case the idea is too far outside the scope of main stream science to garner any notability in that respect, and it is also absent from the popular press. Bobby1011 07:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.