Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Reyes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Big Brother (USA season 3). User talk:The_supersonic_seahawk 10:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Danielle Reyes

The article doesn't have any information in to suggest that she's notable for anything outside of Big Brother. _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 22:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: Not notable, does not warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia. And yes, most of the similar ones should be deleted also, that is not an argument for keeping this one. —Centrx→talk • 22:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete due to unpromising ghits - this article is higher than BB mentions themselves, which is usually a bad sign for notability. Also, the others should be nommed under this AFD as well.(|-- UlTiMuS 22:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - big-brother-cruft. From what I can see, the subject of the article is only credited with being runner-up on series 3 - and the winner of that series doesn't even have an article, so how can Danielle Reyes be notable enough? Her notability is not asserted in the article - a key requirement of WP:BIO. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information - and WP does not need articles on every single big brother contestant (as in appears things are starting to go). If really neccessary - merge appropriate content with the applicable BB seasons. Martinp23 22:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above, unless she does anything else notable. A redirect would be good to deter recreation by newbies. The JPS^{talk to me} 22:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Signficant involvement on a hit show, in two seasons. Unless we apply a double standard to reality TV, versus other types of TV shows, there's no justification for deletion. Wikipedia should be more inclusive than just the stuff (like Star Trek) that most Wikipedians personally like watching. --Rob 23:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete realitycrufts per JPS. I've previously pondered this one and consider her pretty borderline. The fact that she was invited back counts in her favour, but it's doesn't contribute to her life outside BB. 334 Ghits out of 17,300 for "danielle reyes". Easy to miss important stuff, as the hits include a vast majority of porno sites, blog entries, and a number of others related to BB. Then there are also a number of other Daninelle Reyeses, including varsity basketball player, Notre Dame dancer, Wisconsin U person, and daniellereyes.com, which is a girl's amateur nudity site. Ohconfucius 09:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.