Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Urtiz

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:58, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Urtiz

• Delete - not notable... what is this? gren 05:34, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 05:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• keep notable Chubby Chicken 15:38, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Above recently created account, Chubby Chicken, is voting "keep, notable" for numerous clearly non-notable (indeed bordering on speedy) articles. Please keep that grain of information in mind when counting votes. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:14, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• I'm a Usenet poster, too. Delete. Uncle G 16:12, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. You 19:32, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable. - DS1953 19:36, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• delete not notable, description bordering on nonsense --TimPope 22:58, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I've seen this guy, he's a retard.  Grue  13:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.