Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandelion Junk Queens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-07 11:01Z

[edit] Dandelion_Junk_Queens

Dandelion_Junk_Queens (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Dandelion junk queens (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

No reasonable notion of notability. Only attempt to establish notability is a list of tours with two bands who do not have wikipedia pages themselves (presumably also non-notable acts). Top 4 google responces are myspace page, wikipedia entry, and 2 flicker accounts. Tomb Ride ^{My Talk} 06:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete for not being notable, however if a better source is provided I may change my mind. --RazorICEtalkC@ 12:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless links to non-trivial third party articles concerning the band are added before the end of this debate. A1octopus 14:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep the band definitely meets the requirement here: "Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country, reported in reliable sources." by doing TWO tours of the US (and one of the West Coast of the US), as well as touring New Zealand and Australia (though I know the article does not YET mention the last two). As well, the article lists two independent write ups of the band that are not press releases or anything like that. pointing out that the first four google hits are a myspace, wiki entry, and flickr accounts seems irrellevant to me. of the 2,240 hits that come up, of COURSE the first ones are going to be a wiki entry (most of the google searches i do list a wiki entry first), and a bands own page, as google lists by relevancy, and by having a bands page linked from other pages it automatically jumps up in "relevancy" in google searches. as well, i'd like to know what makes an article's source "non-trivial". i'd ask A1octopus to define that in a NPOV way. Murderbike 22:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'd like to note that this user is the creator and sole editor of the page in question.Tomb Ride ^{My Talk} 01:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.