Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Herman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 19:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dan Herman

Dan Herman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

(This page is unrelated to the previous deletion). It kind of looks like he's notable, but I can't find anything that qualifies under reliable sources. He's written books, but they're published by small presses. He's written articles, but they're published on small websites. I removed the prod myself and gave the author feedback, but I'm not seeing the beef yet. Richfife (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, fails WP:BIO. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, poorly written, poorly sourced. Cirt (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC).
• Speedy delete G11, blatant advertising. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - the work he's done is really noteworthy. I don't know what you mean by "small" publishers, he has been published by university press and that is certainly credible. It's not self-publishing or anything. Also, I don't see why large press has to be better. Fox network is large but hardly creditable compared to other sources like (CNN or BBC). Also, give it time, the article may yet still improve. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.108.200 (talk)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO, no reliable sources to be seen. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 14:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't meet biographical standards, the IP (!)voting for keep may have a conflict of interest. — Rudget _{Contributions} 17:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.