Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybermind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep--Commander Keane 06:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cybermind

Delete. Non-notable mailing list; the only websites associated with the list are personal pages (such as the Geocities one listed in the article). Can't seem to find any other mention of it. Deadsalmon 05:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

• Following Hansnesse's observation of the list's notability, I'd just as soon drop the vote. Online documentation seems sparse, though, so perhaps Dr. Marshall could supplement his website with paper references. Keep. Deadsalmon 06:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Don't delete This mailing list is at least as noteable as the other lists noted in wiki. It is over 10 years old for one. It is also, as stated in the article, the subject of some academic research and articles published in refereed journals. The geocities web site holds some of those articles. Who is deadsalmon anyway? Jon Marshall 13 jan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.25.139.183 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 13 January 2006

• Keep The mailing list was the subject of a PhD dissertation from University of Sydney (by the above Jon Marshall in fact), and was featured in several academic articles since then (I only discoved this when I was investigating to nominate for deletion myself). Rewrite, however, to make note of that fact. --Hansnesse 06:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Nominator has withdrawn their deletion vote. Result is to speedy keep.--Commander Keane 06:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.