Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crannog development

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Crannog development

Crannog development (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reads like an advertisment, cannot be anything but one. Ckatzchatspy 19:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

It is meant to show a leader in an alternative way to enjoy the beauty of a natural place while still holding high values and proving it is possible to do it in an eco friendly way.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudy-Impact (talk • contribs)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


I think it is all an advertisement as well. Meldshal42 11:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 11:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per WP:CSD G11 - blatant spam and borderline patent nonsense. The opening paragraph:

    Inspired by the same ideals as the Scottish New World explorers who settled in the area, Crannog could best be described as a new world land development. A new world where power is created, not coveted. A new world where ideas and inspiration flow freely. A new world where people live in harmony with each other and their surroundings.

    What a load of . . . complete bollocks. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong delete. Disgustingly unencyclopedic tone.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. If it wasn't already listed for AfD, I would have given it a speedy-delete spam tag. Canuckle 20:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.