Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cow goes moo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 04:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cow goes moo

Non-notable webcomic, likely fancruft. Article is in poor shape anyway, written in POV and doesn't fit Manual of Style. DoomsDay349 03:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• keep, just rewrite it to fit manual of style. Jontce 03:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless shown significant by proper sources. Friday (talk) 03:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Storong Delete- Nonsense.--SUIT⁴² 03:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Nothing of importance about this article. The Moof Cow, Apple computer's unofficial mascot, is more important, and it doesn't have an article. --Walter Görlitz 03:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually, Clarus does have an article at dogcow. Zetawoof^(ζ) 05:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
    • See how important it is! My day is now complete. However the Cow goes moo still should be deleted. --Walter Görlitz 19:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete (speedy I believe is not an option since the speedy has been contested) In any case, no indication that this has any sort of notability and most of the content is completely unverifiable. Note also that the current article is horrible beyond repair. "sadly an evil capitalist bastard company stole the domain when it expired a year later" I can't see Wikipedia keeping such junk. Pascal.Tesson 03:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I don't want to be associated with such vile fiends that reside on the wikipediainterscapehighway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marge4 (talk • contribs)
• Comment Well, we've got another disgruntled new user...they appear far to often. DoomsDay349 Happy Halloween! 03:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• 'cow goes delete' Z388 03:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

yes hwatever jsut hurry up and fucking delete it oh mighty person who has the awesome powar of what and what not gets to live. white supremacy, clearly! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marge4 (talk • contribs)

• Remember to remain civil.--SUIT^Halloween? 04:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, NN --Steve 04:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, sadly, delete. Cow Goes Moo is more than notable enough for an entry, but I see the points being made for deletion. --Onepointfivevolt 04:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fancruft. Elomis 08:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fancruft, and non-notable. --SunStar Net 08:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy, Speedy Delete. Fancruft, pure fancruft. - jlao ⁰⁴ 11:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

i'd just like to chip in, i am not a fan of cow, it is utter shit. crufts is for dogs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marge4 (talk • contribs)

• Delete - not notable. Xdenizen 00:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Clearly is not notable TheRanger 01:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. This is awful. --- RockMFR 05:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.