Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speed delete. User:Bobby1011 13.03.2006

[edit] Coptography

Neologism. FreplySpang (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Neologism and vanity. As with the Allah-kitten article, this guy likes excuses to put his name in WP. - Fan1967 04:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity nonsense. Palnu 04:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - This article is about an emerging form of art, search on Google, you'll find something about it. - Chaz365 04:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment 26 google hits doesn't even get in the same zip code of anything considered notable. Fan1967 04:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- Neologism. The 20 odd Google hits don't convince me of notability. I'm more than willing to reconsider my opinion if someone can dig up a half-decent source that asserts notability, but I doubt there is one. Reyk 04:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:N, WP:NEO, WP:VAIN, WP:NFT. Alba 04:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.