Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confruition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Confruition

Delete - neologism. A Google search led to 138 hits, all coming from the same four sites. Fabricationary 04:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, the site which apparently coined the phrase has been up since 7/30/06, according to its news page. Only 3 unique Ghits too, leading me to suspect this is an indirect spam article. -- H·G (^words/_works) 07:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, neologism, WP:WEB, etc. --BrownHairedGirl 07:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As per above Mdcollins1984 17:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete another vain attempt to use Wikipedia to give protologisms validity. Danny Lilithborne 20:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, confessed neologism per the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.