Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colossal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Colossal

Basically a dicdef and unencyclopedic (only a synonym of "big"). There is already an entry on "colossal" in Wiktionary that has the etymology. The usage note could be added to the Wiktionary article. SCHZMO ✍ 22:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with the corresponding wiktionary entry if there are additionnal informations. -- Grafikm_fr ^(AutoGRAF) 22:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and I've taken off the transwiki tag, as it adds nothing to the definition already on Wiktionary. I would suggest a possible redirect to Colossus. TheProject 22:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WINAD. Stifle (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly redirect. -Sean Curtin 18:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki and delet, if there is something useful per Stifle. -- ReyBrujo 21:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.