Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision Theatre Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Collision Theatre Company

Collision Theatre Company (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

RS coverage is trivial and local in scope, not even the big Chicago papers. Ghits are primarily play listings and participant information, nothing to assert notability. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 05:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Someday this theatre company may be notable, but it has not yet been clearly established as such. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Non-notable. Doctorfluffy (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.